The UFC 322 event was marred by a shocking brawl between Magomed ‘Chanco’ Zaynukov and Dillon Danis, leaving fans and fighters alike stunned. But was it really unexpected?
‘Chanco’ has no remorse
Magomed Zaynukov, known as ‘Chanco’ or the beloved ‘John Pork’ to his fans, was at UFC 322 to support his teammate Islam Makhachev. But the event took an unexpected turn when Chanco and his crew engaged in a physical altercation with Dillon Danis, a controversial figure in the MMA world. The brawl, which occurred before the main event, led to the removal of all involved from the arena.
In a post-incident interview, Chanco revealed his motivation. He claimed Danis had crossed a line with his words and actions, particularly regarding Zaynukov’s teammates, Islam Makhachev and Khabib. Chanco felt it was his duty to respond, stating, ‘This is my team, these are my brothers, and I am always with them.’
A history of controversy
Dillon Danis, a lightning rod for drama, has a history of making controversial statements. He was previously sued by Nina Agdal, Logan Paul’s wife, for his remarks during the buildup to a boxing match. But this time, Chanco and his team took matters into their own hands, opting for a physical confrontation rather than legal action.
The aftermath and lingering questions
Despite the chaos, no charges were filed, and the physical injuries were minor. UFC CEO Dana White banned Danis from future events, while Chanco expressed disappointment that the fight was cut short, believing Danis deserved more. Chanco’s words hint at a deeper cultural divide: ‘They say anything they want… But for us, any single word has meaning, and you must answer for it.’
But here’s where it gets controversial: Was Chanco’s reaction justified? Is physical violence ever an appropriate response to verbal insults? And what does this incident say about the boundaries of acceptable behavior in the MMA community? Share your thoughts in the comments below!